Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Tibble v. Edison International, a lawsuit that centered on an alleged breach of fiduciary duty by a 401(k) plan sponsor. On May 18th, the Supreme Court issued its unanimous opinion on Tibble.
Is it Time to Review your Company-Sponsored Retirement Plan?
Jun 24, 2015 3:25:29 PM / by Kelley Jensen posted in 401(k) plan, 401(k) plan sponsor, advisor, Kelley Jensen, Tibble v. Edison International, Affordable Care Act, benefits CONSULTING, broker, Company-Sponsored Retirement Plan, company-sponsored retirement plans, ERISA, ERISA plan decision, plan investments
401(k) Sponsors: Scrutiny Intensifies with Impending Decision from the Supreme Court
May 17, 2015 12:27:52 PM / by Deborah Hyde posted in 401(k) plan, 401(k) plan sponsor, Tibble v. Edison International, 401(k), Affordable Care Act, benefits CONSULTING, Deborah Hyde, ERISA
UPDATE: The Supreme Court issued its unanimous opinion in Tibble on Monday, May 18. The Court ruled in favor of the 401(k) participants and held that ERISA’s fiduciary duty requires a continuing duty, “separate and apart from the duty to exercise prudence in selecting investments at the outset,” to monitor plan investments. Significantly, participants will be able to bring a claim of breach of the continuing duty of prudence so long as the alleged breach occurred within six years of the suit. Employers, therefore, must undertake consistent quarterly or annual reviews of investments, and must systematically consider the prudence of each investment at that time. Read the Court’s opinion here.