In 2020, we started the year with a global pandemic that was constantly putting employers through interesting challenges. Pre-COVID-19 times were challenging enough for employers regarding labor law compliance. Fast forward to the present, COVID-19 is still making it much more difficult for management and HR professionals not only to comply with labor laws and continuously changing guidance but to also ensure the safety of their employees from the virus.
The CA Department of Insurance has completed a handful of Town Hall meetings this week and last via County specific webinars. County Supervisor Cindy Chavez hosted the Santa Clara County Town Hall with Commissioner Lara last week. Here’s some key take-aways (much of the dialog was re: Workers Comp and P&C).
If you’re anything like me, when Governor Newsom announced the stay-in-place restrictions, you found it disconcerting, but looked at how your company would continue forward with optimism. “This will just be a couple weeks. We can do it. My team is strong. Working from home will be a new adventure!” But now that we are looking at six weeks with no set return date in sight, and you see first-hand the financial devastation this pandemic is bringing, it’s taking a real effort to keep that optimism in place. And an even bigger effort to ensure your employees stay productive and avoid burnout.
We have done lots of things at Filice to keep our employees engaged…many thoughtful and some silly…but all with a goal of doing our best to help our team navigate this difficult time, so that they can help our clients do the same.
And me? When I am overwhelmed I write. So check out my newest
article on helping your employees avoid burnout. And let me know your thoughts and suggestions. We all need good ideas. Please share them if you have them.
Download the PDF or read the full blog below.
Preventing Remote Employee Burnout
The shift to telecommuting and the use of some amazing technology has made it possible for employees to work at home while staying safe and preventing the spread of COVID-19, but after five weeks, it has also created more than a few challenges. Employees at all levels are showing signs of increased stress and burnout is becoming a real concern.
What is burnout?
Burnout is a state of emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion caused by excessive and prolonged stress. It occurs when people feel overwhelmed, emotionally drained, and unable to meet constant demands.
Is it surprising or scary that too many 401(k) advisors are still unfamiliar with ERISA terms like 3(38) and 3(21)? Probably both. In short the difference depends on how much liability you want to mitigate.
3(21) Co-Fiduciary – “Help me”
- Shared fiduciary liability between the client and advisor for the plan investments.
- The 3(21) advisor recommends the selection and replacement of plan investment options, but the plan sponsor must approve changes.
- 3(21) advisors are suitable for plan sponsors that are comfortable assuming investment fiduciary liability.
- Majority of investment responsibilities are lifted from the plan sponsor and assumed by the 3(38) advisor.
- The 3(38) advisor is responsible for the investment selection, monitoring and replacement of plan options, and the plan sponsor is informed before any changes are made.
- 3(38) advisors are suitable for plan sponsors that don’t have the time and/or do not want to be responsible for the plan’s investments.
- We are starting to see more employers embrace the 3(38) option.
While involving a 3(38) ERISA manager means the sponsor can outsource their fiduciary responsibility, there’s a catch, which resides in the wording of “…if an investment manager is properly appointed.” Plan sponsors must approve the 3(38) investment manager, and properly document the due diligence involved in doing so, something that too many plan sponsors fail to realize.
Referring to a 2017 survey from Charles Schwab, 52% of participants indicated they don’t have the time, interest, or knowledge to manage their 401(k) portfolio. Additionally, 56% indicated they either aren’t aware or don’t review plan-related education material.
So, which type of advisor is best for your plan? It is important that plan sponsors review their relationship with their advisor and determine they are handling the plan appropriately, depending on the capacity in which they are involved.
For help reviewing your advisor relationship and better assessing your options and liability exposure, as always, contact our knowledgeable advisors at Filice Retirement Services.
Vanguard’s 18th edition of How America Saves 2019
Did you ever wonder how you compare to others? Everything you could ever want to know about 401(k) Plans but were afraid to ask can be found within this 100+ page fact-filled publication. While the data is coming from only plans on their platform, the key highlights are consistent with what we have seen across similar type studies. The data set is quite robust consisting of 4.6 million participants in about 2,000 plans. The report reviews participant behavior within the plans that Vanguard provides services to. Here are a few of the highlights:
Target Date Strategies: The use of target date strategies continues to grow. Nine out of 10 plan sponsors offered TDFs at year-end 2018, up more than 50% from 10 years ago. 97% of all Vanguard participants are offered TDFs, while 77% of all participants use these funds. 52% of participants have their entire account invested in a single target date fund. The qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) regulation continues to influence adoption of TDFs. However, voluntary choice remains important since half of single target date investors choose TDFs on their own.
Automatic Saving Features: Automatic enrollment has tripled since year-end 2007. At year-end 2018, 48% of Vanguard plans had adopted automatic enrollment. Two-thirds of auto enrollment plans have implemented auto deferral rate increases. More plans are applying this to all employees versus just new hires.
Plan Participation Rate: In 2018, Vanguard’s plan participation rate was estimated at 82%, up slightly from 2017. Plans with automatic enrollment have a 91% participation rate versus just 60% for plans with voluntary enrollment.
Savings Rates: The average Vanguard participant deferral rate was up slightly to 6.9%. The median deferral rate is 6% which has been the same for as long as they have been tracking this metric. Primarily due to the most common matching formula being 50% of 6% of pay. Roth 401(k) contribution adoption increased in 2018 as the feature was adopted by 71% of Vanguard plans and 11% of participants within these plans elected the option. Only 13% of participants save the maximum allowed including catch-up contributions if applicable.
Loan Activity: Loan activity was generally flat for the year with 15% of participants having a loan outstanding equating to about 1% of aggregate plan assets. The percent of participants that had an outstanding loan is down from 18% in 2013.
Index Investing: In 2018, 613 of Vanguard plans offered a set of options providing an index core. Over the past decade, the number of plans offering an index core has grown by 73%. Counting passive target-date investments, 8 in 10 participants hold index equity options.
Average Account Balance: At year-end 2018, the average account balance for participants was $92,148 while the median balance was $22,217. The large divergence is due to a small number of very large accounts that dramatically raised the average above the median. The average and median account balances in 2018 were lower due to the market related issues in Q4 2018. Automatic enrollment does initially drive down the balance numbers for new participants. This does not factor in outside investments that the participants may hold in other investment or 401(k) accounts.
Participant Trading: During 2018, only 8% of participants traded within their accounts, while 92% did not initiate any exchanges. Vanguard has seen a decline in participant trading over the last decade, partly due to the growth in target date fund adoption by plan participants.
Click here if you would like to learn more about this study. Vanguard also provides a Small Business addition of the study via their partnership with Ascensus. This study is specifically for plans under $20 million in assets. Click Small Business Addition for the report. This is the 2018 version and the 2019 should be available in the summer.
In addition, Vanguard makes available a plan comparison tool. Plan Comparison Tool
If you would like to discuss the results or work with the Filice Team to more specifically benchmark your plan, please let us know.